[Linux-cluster] DLM or GULM?
Kevin Anderson
kanderso at redhat.com
Mon Jan 16 00:11:44 UTC 2006
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 20:59 +0100, Troels Arvin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up two RHEL 4 servers (HP DL380G4) in a fail-over solution,
> using Red Hat Cluster Suite. The two servers are both connected to a HP
> MSA 500G2 RAID storage system (which has two SCSI connectors).
>
> I don't have plans about using GFS at the moment: Only one server will be
> mounting the shared storage system at a time. I plan on using iLO fencing.
>
> The Red Hat Cluster Suite documentation mentions that either DLM or GULM
> should be used for lock management. However, the documentation doesn't
> cover on what basis the choice should be made.
>
> When would DLM be the best choice, and when would GULM be the lock manager
> to go for?
DLM is the best choice. GuLM requires at least 3 nodes in order to
maintain proper quorum in the cluster. DLM has a special 2 node
configuration setup that removes this requirement.
Kevin
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list