[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] High Availability options

Lon Hohberger wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 12:14 -0500, Stephen Kirkpatrick wrote:

Thanks for the reply. I wondered if it was possible to have HA for stateful applications. At least I know my options better now. I can tolerate brief downtime, like the time it would take a failover
node to take over, although no downtime would have been preferred.

Any suggestions on HA solutions for a non-SAN deployment?

You don't need a SAN if you don't intend to share data.
If you intend to share data but do not want a SAN, you'll need to set up
DRBD or CLVM+Cluster Mirroring+GNBD (Note: cluster mirroring is still in
a bit of development).  The main advantage to the latter approach is
simultaneous read/write access from both machines in the cluster.  The
advantage to DRBD is that it is easier to set up.

Alternatively, you could use NFS mounts from a good NAS (a NetApp filer,
as an example) as your source for shared dat.

You can use linux-cluster or Linux-HA to do failover with or without a
SAN; the choice is up to you.  Linux-HA supports DRBD out of the box,
but CLVM will still need parts of linux-cluster running in order to

If you want support, you can use Red Hat Cluster Suite (which is
effectively linux-cluster w/ support).

Good luck!

-- Lon

Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com

Thanks for the info.  If I understood correctly what I was reading
about DRDB, it sounds like it runs entirely over an IP network.
This sounds like what I had originally envisioned for this project,
as it is a small deployment.

I was envisioning SCSI storage in two nodes with individual
internal RAID arrays as depicted in the diagram below,

+----------------+          +------------------+
| Primary server |            | Secondary server |
|                |            |                  |
|  -----------   |/          \|   -----------    |
|     RAID-1     |------------|      RAID-1      |
|  -----------   |\    |     /|   -----------    |
|                |     |      |                  |
+----------------+     |      +------------------+
                      +-- Data sync over IP network?

I was thinking fibre channel storage when I said no SAN.  The
cost of deploying fibre storage is a bit much for this small
project.  However, if there is a good way to utilize shared
SCSI storage and a good HA solution to go along, I would be open
to researching it.

In your response, you indicated that Linux-HA supports DRDB out
of the box.  Does the Red Hat Cluster Suite support this too?
The Cluster Project FAQ just mentions the CLVM/GNBD solution.

Stephen Kirkpatrick

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]