[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: [Linux-cluster] Cluster service restarting Locally



We didn't mount multiple nodes to that file system and also the iSCSI
channel is in a separate subnet.


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces redhat com
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Lon Hohberger
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:09 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: RE: [Linux-cluster] Cluster service restarting Locally

On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 11:02 -0600, Hong Zheng wrote:
> Lon,
> 
> Thanks for your reply. In my system I don't use any lock system like
> lock_gulm or lock_dlm, I use no_lock because our applications'
> limitation. Do you think no_lock will also bring some lock traffic or
> not? 

No, but if you mount the file system on more than one node, say "good
bye" to your data.

> When I tried lock_gulm before, our application had very bad
> performance, so I choose no_lock.
> 
> And I'm not sure which update we have right now. Do you know the
> versions for clumanager and redhat-config-cluster of RHCS3U7?

1.2.28-1 is U6.  U7 will be out soon.  You can contact Red Hat Support
if you want an earlier version.

Another way to make things work a little better for you is to separate
the cluster communication path from the iSCSI path so they're not
contending for the same network.

-- Lon

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]