[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: gfs_fsck problems (not doingget_get_meta_buffer)



Title: Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: gfs_fsck problems (not doingget_get_meta_buffer)

Is the fs code closer to ext than to say xfs?

 -----Original Message-----
From:   David Teigland [mailto:teigland redhat com]
Sent:   Mon May 15 08:23:42 2006
To:     Stephen Willey
Cc:     Daire Byrne; linux-cluster redhat com
Subject:        Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: gfs_fsck problems (not doingget_get_meta_buffer)

On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:46:22AM +0100, Stephen Willey wrote:
> Having looked into this a bit, it appears that gfs_fsck doesn't like
> large drives.
>
> It works fine on a 137Gb drive but fails instantly with the below
> symptoms on a 10Tb RAID.
>
> Is it still the case that GFS is not scalable to very large filesystems?

It's probably more a case of no one ever even trying trying fsck on a fs
that large given how long it would probably take.

Dave

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]