[Linux-cluster] Re: Multiple Active MySQL instances

Tom Mornini tmornini at engineyard.com
Fri Oct 13 21:06:52 UTC 2006


On Oct 13, 2006, at 1:32 PM, David Brieck Jr. wrote:

> On 10/13/06, Tom Mornini <tmornini at engineyard.com> wrote:
>> David Brieck Jr. wrote:
>> > On 9/18/06, David Brieck Jr. <dbrieck at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I've been trying to find more information about using GFS  and  
>> MySQL
>> >> to create a simple active-active mysql cluster without the need  
>> for
>> >> the actual mysql cluster (wouldn't work for our situation).
>> >>
>> >> The only thing I've seen on the mailing list is the following:
>> >>
>> >> -----
>> >> It is possible to use mysql on shared storage with enabled
>> >> external locking
>> >> and also disabling the query cache and few other things:
>> >>
>> >> enable-locking
>> >> query_cache_wlock_invalidate
>> >> query_cache_size= 0
>> >> query_cache_type= 0
>> >> delay_key_write = OFF
>> >> flush
>>
>> I too found this, and tried it. It worked well, except for the HUGE
>> problem (in my case) that it only works for MyISAM tables.
>>
>> Additionally, I didn't test it all that well, as it was unsuitable
>> otherwise.
>
> Thanks for your response, I'm trying it as well right now. Not having
> InnoDB tables isn't a huge problem for us, we can certainly work
> around that with an additional server that just does innodb if we
> absolutely need them.

You're lucky!

> Where there any other configurations you made to get it to work
> properly? I'm using LVS to route traffic to the real servers in my
> tests.

No. My my.cnf has those exact lines in it.

-- 
-- Tom Mornini, CTO
-- Engine Yard, Ruby on Rails Hosting
-- Reliability, Ease of Use, Scalability
-- (866) 518-YARD (9273)





More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list