[Linux-cluster] Cluster vs Distributed?
isplist at logicore.net
isplist at logicore.net
Tue Oct 24 19:53:28 UTC 2006
I'm wondering if I'm missing the full potential of what GFS/clustering could
do for me so figure I'll ask.
I decided to start learning about GFS/Clusters because I really wanted a good
way of running a distributed environment for some Internet based services.
For example, I'm using GFS and remote storage to provide central areas for
multiple web, mail and other servers to get/store/share their data. So, each
server has it's own small drive and OS but each server shares central areas
for it's services, be it web, mail, etc. If one server goes down, there are
others there to keep going based on a front end of load balancers.
Of course, if a machine needs rebuilding, then it's a full rebuild, then copy
what I need, make it what it's supposed to be and stick it back into the
cluster. Each server shares it's data with the others.
Now on the other hand, the clustering I think the Linux LVS (is that what it's
called?) would give me a single single image type cluster would it not? I
mean, each node would be a part of a single system, just keep adding nodes to
expand the system and performance.
Which is best then? It seems each does similar things with it's own pluses and
minuses. Is my use of the GFS clustering a good use or am I missing serious
benefits?
Mike
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list