[Linux-cluster] Active/Passive - GFS needed?

[ben henrion]

No at all ....
GFS is able to support FOS and multi write/read in the same FS. If you
needn't use ext3.

2007/4/5, Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow at redhat.com>:
>
> not really.  You could use cluster suite (rgmanager) for failover and use
> ext3.
>  brassow
>
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Brad Filipek wrote:
>
> I will have a two node cluster connecting to a fibre channel SAN (AX150).
> There is only one application on the server that our users will access by
> using telnet or SSH with a terminal emulator. If I setup this two node
> cluster up as active/passive, is there a need for GFS?
>
>
>
>
>
> Brad Filipek
> Network Administrator
> Continental Refrigerated Services, LLC.
> P- (708) 587-3640
> F- (708) 534-4699
> bfilipek at crscold.com
> http://www.crscold.com
>
>
>
>
>
> *Confidentiality Notice: *This message is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the
> employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
> immediately by email reply or by telephone and immediately delete this
> message and any attachments.
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20070406/e7c42ae8/attachment.htm>