[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] dlm spinlock BUG



On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:51:53PM +0100, Patrick Caulfield wrote:
> Jens Beyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am (trying) t run a GFS testcluster based on cluster-2.00.00 and 2.6.20.6/32bit
> > vs  cluster-2.00.00 and 2.6.20.6/64bit. 
> > 
> > When mounting the  shared device on both nodes I get on the 32bit node:
> > 
> > [82301.201322] BUG: spinlock already unlocked on CPU#2, dlm_recoverd/21239
> > [82301.201335]  lock: eaf638e4, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: -1
> > [82301.201356]  [<c01d62ac>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x70/0x72
> > [82301.201375]  [<f54c2e39>] dlm_lowcomms_get_buffer+0x53/0xed [dlm]
> > [82301.201408]  [<f54bead7>] create_rcom+0x2d/0xb3 [dlm]
> > [82301.201435]  [<f54bec9a>] dlm_rcom_status+0x45/0x110 [dlm]
> > [82301.201461]  [<f54be278>] ping_members+0x38/0x85 [dlm]
> > [82301.201486]  [<f54be463>] dlm_recover_members+0x19e/0x1d9 [dlm]
> > [82301.201512]  [<f54c066e>] ls_recover+0x6b/0x2dd [dlm]
> > [82301.201537]  [<f54c0942>] do_ls_recovery+0x62/0x80 [dlm]
> > [82301.201558]  [<f54c0960>] dlm_recoverd+0x0/0x85 [dlm]
> > [82301.201580]  [<f54c09ad>] dlm_recoverd+0x4d/0x85 [dlm]
> > [82301.201602]  [<c012d830>] kthread+0x8c/0xb1
> > [82301.201614]  [<c012d7a4>] kthread+0x0/0xb1
> > [82301.201625]  [<c0103a33>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x14
> > [82301.201636]  =======================
> 
> Which kernel are you using ?
> 

I am using a vanilla 2.6.20.6 (same with 2.6.20.x).

Jens


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]