[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] LVS redundancy server and network type: DIRECT



Tx for the reply,
I re read the doc and my  question remains :-)
ex :
from the RH documentation :
Create the ARP table entries for each virtual IP address on each real
server (the real_ip is the IP the director uses to communicate with the
real server; often this is the IP bound to eth0):
arptables -A IN -d <virtual_ip> -j DROP
arptables -A OUT -d <virtual_ip> -j mangle --mangle-ip-s <real_ip>


If I create a redundancy server, and if the master server goes down, the
backup server will create all the <virtual_ip> but not the <real_ip> so
all the real servers still have the arptables setting to modify the
source of the IP packet to look likes the master LVS server that is down
now.


Marek 'marx' Grac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FM wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm trying to create a LVS redundancy server with redundacy server.
>>
>> The problem is LVS1 moved the virtual address to the LVS2 server. But
>> the real server, using arptables still have the LVS1 ip address in the
>> arptables_jf rule.
>>
>> is it possible to use redundancy server with direct routing ?
>>   
> Yes, it is possible. Direct routing is described in manual:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-5-manual/Virtual_Server_Administration/index.html
>
>
>
> marx,
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]