[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 problem.



Hi,

Does anyone have experience with ocfs2 compared to gfs1 (or gfs2). Are
there any news on performance?

Kind Regards
Kristoffer

-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Brieseneck, Arne, VF-Group [mailto:Arne Brieseneck vodafone com] 
Sendt: 4. juni 2007 17:06
Til: linux clustering; Kristoffer Lippert
Emne: RE: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 problem.

Hi David,

You know, that GFS1 is slow like hell... I truly can understand
Kristoffer when he wants to have GFS2. The throughput is much better.
On the other hand Kristoffer could use professional cluster filesystems
for PROD systems like Veritas FS. Afaik VFS is also available for RHEL.

Arne

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces redhat com
[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of David Teigland
Sent: Montag, 4. Juni 2007 16:57
To: Kristoffer Lippert
Cc: linux-cluster redhat com
Subject: Re: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: [Linux-cluster] GFS2 problem.

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:50:15PM +0200, Kristoffer Lippert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've looked at the options, and it seems that building a new kernel is

> the only way to go about it.
> 
> RHEL 5.1 is scheduled for okt/nov, and that long we cannot wait.

GFS2 is still in preview/beta mode; you shouldn't use it for production
purposes yet (regardless of the kernel).  Just use GFS(1) instead.

Dave

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]