[Linux-cluster] Using GFS on Compact Flash

HAWKER, Dan (external) Dan.HAWKER at uk4.astrium.eads.net
Tue Mar 13 09:56:32 UTC 2007


> Does it make sense to use  GFS (local or cluster mode) on
> Compact Flash? Will it greatly reduce the life expectancy of
> the Compact Flash compared to using a local file system? The
> rational behind this is that GFS will issue way more writes
> to the disk for its internal operations ( such as dlm locking etc).
>

Ummm, why would you want to use CF & GFS together???

Surely you'd only use GFS for a shared pool of storage. As the largest
CF card you can sensibly get atm is around 8GB, that's not a lot of
storage to be shared by multiple nodes.

Now we use CF cards for embedded boxes, but for exactly the reasons you
mentioned (poor MTBF/reduced lifetime due to the read/write process),
our cards are invariably read-only filesystems and we use ext2 to get
rid of the journaling too. No swap either (which has caused some trouble
on one or two occasions, but that's another story).

Dan

--

Dan Hawker
Linux System Administrator
Astrium
http://www.astrium.eads.net

--

This email (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information or information otherwise protected from disclosure.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, do not copy this message or any attachments and do not use it for any purpose or disclose its content to any person, but delete this message and any attachments from your system.
Astrium disclaims any and all liability if this email transmission was virus corrupted, altered or falsified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259
Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list