[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] I give up



Scott Becker wrote:
> Yes, slow at best. This list is better. Support is not the issue. I'm 
> shooting for 100% uptime with simple failover. There are too many problems 
> with the software and I'm a month behind schedule. The biggest problem is 
> the core system is malfunctioning. Smaller problem is that in the same test 
> I ran into the fencing issue that others have experienced, the menus are 
> too dynamic for the current fence_apc agent.
>
> A month ago I thought, steep learning curve and then I'll be all set. 
> redhat.com gives the distinct impression that they are selling a completed 
> solution. I disagree.

Have you tried RHEL 4.6 cluster? It's setup is really smooth oposite to
RHEL 5.0, according to my experience. (As I said before, we will be
trying 5.1 in few days).

Jakub


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]