[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS RG size (and tuning)



Yea larger - sorry larger I meant

<snip>
Yes, it is definitely possible that using a bigger resource group may help
with performance.  Since this is not yet in production, I would urge you to
do some testing now while you can and compare results from the default size
of 256 versus a setting of around 2048.
</snip>

On 10/27/07 2:21 PM, "Jos Vos" <jos xos nl> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:15:33PM -0400, Josh Gray wrote:
> 
>> Support said i would probably expect significant improvement with
>> more RG's but we went with the other file format before we tried that.
> 
> You mean *less* (and larger) RGs I presume?

-- 
Josh Gray
Systems Administrator
NIC Inc

Email: jgray nicusa com
Desk/Mobile: 913-221-1520

"It is not the mountain we conquer, but ourselves."
- Sir Edmund Hillary




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]