[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS as a Resource



On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:00 PM, Chris Edwards
<cedwards smartechcorp net> wrote:
> I don't care either way, I was just responding to the last reply to my
> message.  The only reason I was thinking that you wouldn't want an fstab
> entry is so that a server doesn't mount the GFS file systems until its apart
> of the cluster.

I had issues with this exact problem, so I edited /etc/init.d/gfs and
changed chkconfig startup sequence order to a higher number (but still
lower than all services that depend on gfs mounts).

>
> ---
>
> Chris Edwards
> Smartech Corp.
> Div. of AirNet Group
> http://www.airnetgroup.com
> http://www.smartechcorp.net
> cedwards smartechcorp net
> P:  423-664-7678 x114
> C:  423-593-6964
> F:  423-664-7680
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-cluster-bounces redhat com
> [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces redhat com] On Behalf Of Brett Cave
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:53 PM
> To: linux clustering
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS as a Resource
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Chris Edwards
> <cedwards smartechcorp net> wrote:
>> Without a entry in fstab my gfs file systems never mount.   So I am
>> wondering how I can leave out entries in my fstab.
>
> AFAIK, fstab is needed, unless u want to run gfs_mount with all the
> params. Why would you specifically not want to have fstab entries?
>
>
> Brett
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]