[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: [Linux-cluster] noatime



Hi,

noatime will reduce traffic since if it's not there, each time you touch a file (read, write) it will change the value of the field "last access".

But, just adding it to the fstab did not work in my case.

Is there another way for the noatime?



Has for your isplist, look here http://sourceware.org/cluster/faq.html#gfs_slowaftermount


Alexandre Racine
514-461-1300 poste 3304
alexandre racine mhicc org



-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces redhat com on behalf of isplist logicore net
Sent: Tue 2008-01-29 11:09
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] noatime
 
Were you trying this for a specific reason? I tried noatime to see if I could 
get a faster initial response time from the GFS volume. Every time I access 
it, there is a long delay initially, then things are fine until the next 
access.


On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:26:19 -0500, Alexandre Racine wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> If I put in my fstab file:
> /dev/sdc5               /home           gfs     noatime
> 
> 
> Will it actually mount without atime? And how can I confirm this?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> Alexandre Racine
> 514-461-1300 poste 3304
> alexandre racine mhicc org




--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


<<winmail.dat>>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]