[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] GFS in High Traffic ?


We have similar demands at my customer, and with larger file systems. We have gotten good results by placing the cluster traffic on a dedicated interface. Once the cluster traffic (as defined in the cluster.conf file) was placed on a dedicated interface all our stabilization problems disappeared. If you hardware is interface limited, you can use vlan tagging and place the cluster traffic in a dedicated vlan. It doesn't provide the additional bandwidth but it seems to dramatically help.

When we asked the same question, the general answer from the developers was, "it is always a good idea to place cluster traffic on a dedicated interface." As an interesting note, for an oracle RAC installation, the Oracle cluster traffic MUST be on a dedicated interface.

Paul Berry wrote:
Hey guys - we're struggling with a GFS setup to get our 8 high traffic
servers onto a NEXSAN SataBoy so that we can leave our RSYNC process
which we've pushed to the extents of its capacity

We don't have all that much data, its less then  1TB total. The trick
is that these files get requested simultaneously under pretty
significant load. And as soon as we get 3 or 4 servers mounted to the
SAN we get melt-downs.

We also struggled today with one server messing with the journals and
taking down the other servers that were looking at the SAN (disaster).

The broad question I'd love to hear - is GFS a good solution to get
into for a situation like this?

I'd love to hear thoughts on this, and suggestions on the right path
is this seems like the wrong one

Best regards,

Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com

Leo J Pleiman
Senior Consultant, GPS Federal

fn:Leo J Pleiman, RHCE
n:Pleiman;Leo J
org:;GPS Federal
email;internet:lpleiman redhat com
title:Senior Consultant

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]