[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] accessing GFS with fail of one cman



yep, there is a device. I have found out that the gfs module displayed
same errors during the system start. I updated the kernel and downloaded
the lastest rpm-s and it is ok.

thanks for helping.
Paul Morgan pisze:
> Do you have a /dev/sdf?
> And if so does it have a gfs or gfs2 filesystem, or is the filesystem on /dev/sdf1 (a partition)?
> 
> If in doubt, use gfs_tool &/or gfs2_tool to examine the sb (superblock) of the device you're trying to mount.
> 
> Hth,
> -paul
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mikołaj Radzewicz <m radzewicz tech crmedia pl>
> 
> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:10:13 
> To: linux clustering<linux-cluster redhat com>
> Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] accessing GFS with fail of one cman
> 
> 
> so although i managed to set run this cluster - i don't know why i
> didn't try this earlier, i am still not able to mount the GFS, I am
> still geting the same error message:
> /sbin/mount.gfs: error mounting /dev/sdf on /mnt/tmp: No such device
> 
> although the device is seen....
> 
> Mikołaj Radzewicz pisze:
>> hello,
>> I'm setting two node cluster but for now I need only one of them...
>> I have configured the cluster for two nodes and with "two node" option
>> but the cluster doesn't want to start... (I'm not able to turn the cman
>> demon on the second cluster node). It is some why to mount the GFS file
>> system locally with cman demon or without it? I have tried to mount it
>> with lock_nolock option but it doesn't help. I have below error:
>>
>> /sbin/mount.gfs: error mounting /dev/sdf on /mnt/tmp: No such device
>>
>> I found out that there is no problem with mounting it when the cluster
>> start properly(and later one of node will die) but what if I need access
>> to resource and I am not able to get the second cman working??? Please
>> help me to solve this issue!
>>
>> Is it some way to made 4-nodes cluster to keep on working when 2 of its
>> member will fail?
>>
>>
>> Is it generally some way to access files on the GFS with one single server?
> 
> 


-- 
Mikołaj


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]