[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] EXT3 or GFS shared disk



I forgot to turn on clvmd but now that I do I'm getting some 'Call Trace' issues...


----- Original Message -----
From: "James Marcinek" <jmarc1 jemconsult biz>
To: "linux clustering" <linux-cluster redhat com>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:38:33 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] EXT3 or GFS shared disk

I'm running 5.3 and it gave me a locking issue and indicated that it couldn't create the logical volume. However it showed up and I had some issues getting rid of it.

I couldn't get rid of the LVM because it couldn't locate the id. In the end I rebooted the node and then I could get rid of it...

I would prefer to use logical volumes if possible. The packages are there, one of the nodes did have an issue with the clvmd not starting...

I'm working on rebuilding the cluster.conf. It kept coming up as in the config but 'not a member'. When I went into system-config-cluster on one node it showed up as a member but not the other. Went to the other node and the same thing, it was a member but not the other.

Right now, I've totally scratched the original cluster.conf. I created a new one and copied it to the second node. started cman and rgmanager and the same thing they both are in the configs but only one member in the cluster management tab...

What's going on?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Luis Cerezo" <Luis Cerezo pgs com>
To: "linux clustering" <linux-cluster redhat com>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:14:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] EXT3 or GFS shared disk

what grief did it give you? also- what version of RHEL are you running?

5.1 has some known issues with clvmd

-luis

Luis E. Cerezo
Global IT
GV: +1 412 223 7396

On Sep 10, 2009, at 12:37 PM, James Marcinek wrote:

> Hello again,
>
> Next question.
>
> Again since my cluster class (back in '04) GFS wasn't around so I'm  
> not sure if I should use this or not in the cluster build...
>
> If I have an active/passive cluster where only one node needs to  
> have access to the file system at a given time should I just use an  
> ext3 partition or should I use GFS on a logical volume?
>
> I just tried to create an lvm shared logical volume with an ext3  
> parition (already did an lvmconf --enable-cluster) but it caused me  
> some grief and I switched it to a partition after cleaning up...
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, forward, copy, print or rely on this e-mail in any way except as permitted by the author.

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]