[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] heartbeat



Ed Sanborn schrieb:

I am intrigued by this thread. I am using RH Advanced Platform version 5.2. I have an 8-node cluster

running on an IBM Bladecenter. For those that may not be familiar with the IBM Bladecenter the blades have 2 NICs

on them and the Bladecenter chassis has a Nortel switch that the NIC’s connect to. I am using both NIC’s plugged

into two segments of my LAN. One of them is being used for the multicast heartbeat traffic. It works BUT occasionally

my network has serious disruptions due to this being a telecommunications company and the engineers are

always doing something to loop the network and/or saturate the network with broadcasts taking down the

subnet that my heartbeat traffic is on. Sometimes when this happens the network is so bad

that the multicast traffic is affected and I lose quorum on the cluster. Once I fix the network problem I need

to restart each node to get the cluster back up and running. Not good and not the correct design.

I would love to NOT use a public NIC for the multicast/heartbeat traffic. I tried to setup virtual interfaces and

VLAN those in the Nortel switch and moving the multicast/heartbeat traffic over to them, leaving the 2 NICS on the original LAN segments they were on but even with IBM assistance we were unsuccessful. Does anyone have any experience

with this? I want to do this to truly isolate the heartbeat network to eliminate any possibility for network congestion

taking down the cluster and also because I do not want the multicast traffic pumped all over the LAN.


What I do not understand at the moment: If you can afford to restrict one of every blade's two interfaces to cluster communication, why don't you put them into a VLAN (the real interfaces, not virtual ones) and see to it that the VLAN has not connection to any outside network? Then the engineers would have no means of flooding your cluster communication subnet.

Dirk

Thanks,

Ed

(978) 210-9855

*From:* linux-cluster-bounces redhat com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces redhat com] *On Behalf Of *Kumar, Ashish
*Sent:* Monday, February 01, 2010 12:53 PM
*To:* Fagnon Raymond; linux clustering
*Subject:* Re: [Linux-cluster] heartbeat

    I don’t have any nics that I can dedicate for a cross over cable
    for heartbeat so I was thinking I could use the serial or the
    network itself. Is it possible to just use the primary interface
    for heartbeat since it is my understanding it is nothing more than
    a ping.


You don't need to dedicate a NIC for heartbeat with Red Hat Cluster. Unlike Linux-HA, RHCS makes use of multicast to communicate with other nodes. The multicast IP address is assigned by RHCS automatically, so you don't need to do any special configuration.

Please have a look at this: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Cluster_Administration/s1-multicast-considerations-CA.html

For setup instructions, check this: http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Cluster_Administration/s1-general-prop-conga-CA.html - Section 3 deals with Multicast address settings

------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]