[Linux-cluster] Failover not happening when SAN connectivity failed

Kukkala Prasad kprasad at cordys.com
Fri Feb 5 04:40:14 UTC 2010


Hi Charles,

Here is the configuration details.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<cluster alias="mysqlha" config_version="80" name="mysqlha">
        <fence_daemon post_fail_delay="0" post_join_delay="3"/>
        <clusternodes>
                <clusternode name="srv-int-rs4.ourdomain.com" nodeid="1" votes="1">
                        <fence>
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="vb4-rs4"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>
                </clusternode>
                <clusternode name="srv-int-rs5.ourdomain.com" nodeid="2" votes="1">
                        <fence>
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="vb2-rs5"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>
                </clusternode>
                <clusternode name="srv-int-rs6.ourdomain.com" nodeid="3" votes="1">
                        <fence>
                                <method name="1">
                                        <device name="perf10-rs6"/>
                                </method>
                        </fence>
                </clusternode>
        </clusternodes>
        <cman/>
        <fencedevices>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="ilo-int-vb4" login="admin" name="vb4-rs4" passwd="*****"/>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="ilo-int-vb2" login="admin" name="vb2-rs5" passwd="*****"/>
                <fencedevice agent="fence_ilo" hostname="ilo-int-perf10" login="admin" name="perf10-rs6" passwd="*****"/>
        </fencedevices>
        <rm>
                <failoverdomains>
                        <failoverdomain name="faiodom1" ordered="0" restricted="1">
                                <failoverdomainnode name="srv-int-rs4.ourdomain.com" priority="1"/>
                                <failoverdomainnode name="srv-int-rs5.ourdomain.com" priority="1"/>
                        </failoverdomain>
                </failoverdomains>
                <resources>
                        <lvm lv_name="SANLogVol01" name="SAN Volume" vg_name="SANVolGroup01"/>
                        <fs device="/dev/SANVolGroup01/SANLogVol01" force_fsck="0" force_unmount="0" fsid="4190" fstype="ext3" mountpoint="/mysqldb" name="sanvolume" options="" self_fence="0"/>
                        <ip address="12.151.50.91" monitor_link="1"/>
                        <mysql config_file="/etc/my.cnf" listen_address="12.151.50.91" mysql_options="" name="mysql" shutdown_wait="5"/>
                </resources>
                <service autostart="1" domain="faiodom1" name="mysql-service" recovery="relocate">
                        <lvm ref="SAN Volume"/>
                        <fs ref="sanvolume"/>
                        <ip ref="12.151.50.91"/>
                        <mysql ref="mysql"/>
                </service>
        </rm>
</cluster>

Regards,
Prasad.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Charles Riley
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:59 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Failover not happening when SAN connectivity failed

<Null pointer error>
(you don't really expect someone to help you with no information regarding your configuration, do you?)

Charles

Charles Riley
eRAD, Inc.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Kukkala Prasad" <kprasad at cordys.com>
To: linux-cluster at redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2010 5:42:35 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Linux-cluster] Failover not happening when SAN connectivity failed





Hi All, 



We have a cluster setup with Redhat Cluster Suite on RHEL5 OS. 

SAN is one of the resource configured in the cluster. 

We observed that if the SAN connectivity is lost on a given node then resources are not getting failovered to second node. How to resolve this problem? 



Regards, 

Prasad. 

The information contained in this communication is confidential, intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may be legally privileged and protected by professional secrecy. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This email does not constitute any commitment from Cordys Holding BV or any of its subsidiaries except when expressly agreed in a written agreement between the intended recipient and Cordys Holding BV or its subsidiaries. Cordys is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt. Cordys does not guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been m!
 aintained nor that the communication is free of viruses, interceptions or interference. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please return the communication to the sender and delete and destroy all copies. 

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

--
Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster at redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list