[Linux-cluster] GFS2 versus ext3/4

[Devrim GÜNDÜZ]

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 13:15 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> 
> If you're sure that only one node can mount it, using ext3/4 gives
> more performance compared to gfs(2).

There is no 100% guarantee for it, but of course, it might be worth
trying then.

Regards,
-- 
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110425/5228a419/attachment.sig>