[Linux-cluster] clusternode name and uname -n
Alvaro Jose Fernandez
alvaro.fernandez at sivsa.com
Thu Apr 28 06:09:51 UTC 2011
Hadn't to...for example look at the scenario where there is a separation
between the heartbeat/fencing network, and the application/public
network.
In this case it's seems logical to me that clusternode name should point
to private names (ie, call them "nodexxx-hb" or "nodexxx-private" , etc.
Unrelated to the public hostnames and on different IP networks.
alvaro
>Somewhere along the way, I got the idea that <clunsternode name="...">
>had to match 'uname -n'. Am I mad, or is this in fact the case? If it
is
>the case, why?
>I hate saying "this must be so" without understanding the mechanics of
>why. If I am wrong, then I need a boot to the head. :P
--
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list