[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] How to run same service in parallel in RedHat Cluster 5.0

Good example, thanks.
Not sure if is doable because we could have 10 servers and the idea to have
10 service instances could be tricky to admin :(

What about the other q, related with the usage of same name of devices and
mounting points?

Sent from my PDP-11

On 27-Sep-2011 7:25 PM, "Digimer" <linux alteeve com> wrote:

> Forgot to include an example;
> This link shows RGManager/cluster.conf configured with two single-node
> failoverdomains (for managing the storage services needed to be running
> on both nodes in a 2-node cluster) and two failoverdomains used for a
> service that can migrate (a VM, specifially). It will hopefully be
> useful as a template for what you are trying to do.
> https://alteeve.com/w/Red_Hat_Cluster_Service_2_Tutorial#Creating_the_Ordered_
> Failover_Domains

On 27-Sep-2011 7:18 PM, "Digimer" <linux alteeve com> wrote:

> On 09/27/2011 02:29 PM, Ruben Sajnovetzky wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I¹m in the process of design a solution replacement to a Veritas
>> implementation and have to find similar functionalities, not
>> sure if this is doable in Red Hat Clutser:
>>     We have a distributed application that runs in several servers
>> simultaneously and that application must run in a cluster environment.
>>     The summary is as follows:
>>         1. Application has two different roles for the Servers, one we
>> could call ³Central Server² and the others ³Collectors².
>>         2. Application has _one_ Central Server and _X_ Collector Servers.
>>         3. Central Server + Collector Servers represents a set of
>> servers that must be running all time and we want to implement
>>            two sets in order to implement failovers between them.
>>         4. _First issue I have_:
>>                 Application is installed in _all servers_ at same
>> location, let us say ³/opt/app² and I want to monitor it in all them (i.e.:
>>                 different, separated, independent instances in separated
>> servers).
>>                 In Veritas we had ³fscentral² and ³fscollector², both
>> with same device name and mounting point and that worked fine,
>>                 (of course, both resources were part of different
>> service groups and running in different servers).
>>                 I tried to do the same here and got an error:
>>             clurgmgrd[9374]: <err> Unique attribute collision. type=fs
>>             attr=mountpoint value=/opt
>>              clurgmgrd[9374]: <err> Error storing fs resource
>>          Then, I assume should be a different way to implement this
>>         resource? Notice that the number of Collectors is variable so I
>>           can¹t say ³collector 1 will be mounted as /opt1² or ³collector
>>         1 will have volume name as vol1².
>>     5. Second issue I have:
>>             How I can run the ³service² ³app collector² in more than one
>>     server simultaneously (in parallel)?
>>             Again, the option to have ³X² services for ³X² Collectors is
>>     not a real option here.
>> Any idea will be appreciated!!!
>>     Thanks
> I've not read this carefully (at work, sorry), but if I grasped your
> question;
> For services you want to run on all servers;
> - Defined a unique failoverdomain containing each node to run the
> parallel services.
> - Create the a service multiple times, each using the failoverdomain
> containing the single target node.
> For services to run on one node, but move on failure, create another
> failover domain (ordered, if you want to set preferences) with the
> candidate nodes as members. Then create a service and assign it to this
> domain.
> To provide your cluster.conf (or as much as you've crafted so far).
> Please only obfuscate passwords if possible.
> -- 
> Digimer
> E-Mail:              digimer alteeve com
> Freenode handle:     digimer
> Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
> Node Assassin:       http://nodeassassin.org
> "At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially,
> a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab
> through the sky with fire and math?"

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]