[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat without qdisk

If don't use the qdisk who is the master in the split-brain?

Who take the resources?

What are you concerns about fence_scsi?

fence_scsi in redhat 5.X doesn't reboot the node, the fenced node neve release the resources

Why redhat made the qdisk as Tie-breakers and some people from support say it's one optional or some time says is not needed?

Il giorno 12 aprile 2012 17:51, Ryan O'Hara <rohara redhat com> ha scritto:
On 04/12/2012 10:18 AM, emmanuel segura wrote:
That's right

you'll found your cluster partitioned and if you "<cman two_node="1"
expected_votes="1">" as redhat setting our cluster maybe you get data

How? What fence agent are you using? I've used this configuration for years and never had data corruption.

Because every node can operate with one vote an rich the quorum state

Forse the fencing problem redhat implement a work around as permanent

fence delay for some cluster agents

For fence_scsi in Redhat 5.X the redhat support says it's ok for production
BAAAAA not tre

What are you concerns about fence_scsi?

AND i the redhat technical tells the cluster don't require the quorum disk

Can you explain why qdisk would be required?


Il giorno 12 aprile 2012 16:47, Daniel Bourque
<dbourque accuweather com>ha scritto:

 A qdisk is just another way to maintain quorum in cluster. there is a
special two node cluster mode designed to allow for quorum to be maintained
by the surviving node.

 <cman two_node="1" expected_votes="1">

 But it's not very clear to me what happens with fencing if both nodes
get partitioned on the network. Do they both try to fence each other off ?


*From:* linux-cluster-bounces redhat com [linux-cluster-bounces redhat com]

on behalf of emmanuel segura [emi2fast gmail com]
*Sent:* Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:25 AM
*To:* linux clustering
*Subject:* [Linux-cluster] Redhat without qdisk

 Hello all List

I have a big question about qdisk in a two cluster

one of out clients has too many cluster in two nodes configuration and one
RedHat technical came to us and said that there is no need to use the

I would to know if this is true

I really think it's a bad idea

esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera

Linux-cluster mailing list
Linux-cluster redhat com

esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]