[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Linux-cluster] Redhat without qdisk



On 04/12/2012 12:04 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
> If don't use the qdisk who is the master in the split-brain?
> 
> Who take the resources?
> 
> What are you concerns about fence_scsi?
> 
> fence_scsi in redhat 5.X doesn't reboot the node, the fenced node neve
> release the resources
> 
> Why redhat made the qdisk as Tie-breakers and some people from support
> say it's one optional or some time says is not needed?

I could see an argument for qdisk with fabric fencing. However, with
power fencing, the node to take resources is the fastest node. The
slower node will be powered off before the survivor recovers services.

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]