[Linux-cluster] how to handle fence for a simple apache active/passive cluster with virtual ip on 2 virtual machine

Digimer lists at alteeve.ca
Sat Feb 1 21:04:51 UTC 2014


Ooooh, I'm not sure what option you have then. I suppose 
fence_virtd/fence_xvm is your best option, but you're going to need to 
have the admin configure the fence_virtd side.

On 01/02/14 03:50 PM, nik600 wrote:
> My problem is that i don't have root access at host level.
>
> Il 01/feb/2014 19:49 "Digimer" <lists at alteeve.ca
> <mailto:lists at alteeve.ca>> ha scritto:
>
>     On 01/02/14 01:35 PM, nik600 wrote:
>
>         Dear all
>
>         i need some clarification about clustering with rhel 6.4
>
>         i have a cluster with 2 node in active/passive configuration, i
>         simply
>         want to have a virtual ip and migrate it between 2 nodes.
>
>         i've noticed that if i reboot or manually shut down a node the
>         failover
>         works correctly, but if i power-off one node the cluster doesn't
>         failover on the other node.
>
>         Another stange situation is that if power off all the nodes and then
>         switch on only one the cluster doesn't start on the active node.
>
>         I've read manual and documentation at
>
>         https://access.redhat.com/__site/documentation/en-US/Red___Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/__Cluster_Administration/index.__html
>         <https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Cluster_Administration/index.html>
>
>         and i've understand that the problem is related to fencing, but the
>         problem is that my 2 nodes are on 2 virtual machine , i can't
>         control
>         hardware and can't issue any custom command on the host-side.
>
>         I've tried to use fence_xvm but i'm not sure about it because if
>         my VM
>         has powered-off, how can it reply to fence_vxm messags?
>
>         Here my logs when i power off the VM:
>
>         ==> /var/log/cluster/fenced.log <==
>         Feb 01 18:50:22 fenced fencing node mynode02
>         Feb 01 18:50:53 fenced fence mynode02 dev 0.0 agent fence_xvm
>         result:
>         error from agent
>         Feb 01 18:50:53 fenced fence mynode02 failed
>
>         I've tried to force the manual fence with:
>
>         fence_ack_manual mynode02
>
>         and in this case the failover works properly.
>
>         The point is: as i'm not using any shared filesystem but i'm only
>         sharing apache with a virtual ip, i won't have any split-brain
>         scenario
>         so i don't need fencing, or not?
>
>         So, is there the possibility to have a simple "dummy" fencing?
>
>         here is my config.xml:
>
>         <?xml version="1.0"?>
>         <cluster config_version="20" name="hacluster">
>                   <fence_daemon clean_start="0" post_fail_delay="0"
>         post_join_delay="0"/>
>                   <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1"/>
>                   <clusternodes>
>                           <clusternode name="mynode01" nodeid="1" votes="1">
>                                   <fence>
>                                           <method name="mynode01">
>                                                   <device domain="mynode01"
>         name="mynode01"/>
>                                           </method>
>                                   </fence>
>                           </clusternode>
>                           <clusternode name="mynode02" nodeid="2" votes="1">
>                                   <fence>
>                                           <method name="mynode02">
>                                                   <device domain="mynode02"
>         name="mynode02"/>
>                                           </method>
>                                   </fence>
>                           </clusternode>
>                   </clusternodes>
>                   <fencedevices>
>                           <fencedevice agent="fence_xvm" name="mynode01"/>
>                           <fencedevice agent="fence_xvm" name="mynode02"/>
>                   </fencedevices>
>                   <rm log_level="7">
>                           <failoverdomains>
>                                   <failoverdomain name="MYSERVICE"
>         nofailback="0"
>         ordered="0" restricted="0">
>                                           <failoverdomainnode
>         name="mynode01"
>         priority="1"/>
>                                           <failoverdomainnode
>         name="mynode02"
>         priority="2"/>
>                                   </failoverdomain>
>                           </failoverdomains>
>                           <resources/>
>                           <service autostart="1" exclusive="0"
>         name="MYSERVICE"
>         recovery="relocate">
>                                   <ip address="192.168.1.239"
>         monitor_link="on"
>         sleeptime="2"/>
>         <apache config_file="conf/httpd.conf" name="apache"
>         server_root="/etc/httpd" shutdown_wait="0"/>
>                           </service>
>                   </rm>
>         </cluster>
>
>         Thanks to all in advance.
>
>
>     The fence_virtd/fence_xvm agent works by using multicast to talk to
>     the VM host. So the "off" confirmation comes from the hypervisor,
>     not the target.
>
>     Depending on your setup, you might find better luck with fence_virsh
>     (I have to use this as there is a known multicast issue with Fedora
>     hosts). Can you try, as a test if nothing else, if 'fence_virsh'
>     will work for you?
>
>     fence_virsh -a <host ip> -l root -p <host root pw> -n <virsh name
>     for target vm> -o status
>
>     If this works, it should be trivial to add to cluster.conf. If that
>     works, then you have a working fence method. However, I would
>     recommend switching back to fence_xvm if you can. The fence_virsh
>     agent is dependent on libvirtd running, which some consider a risk.
>
>     hth
>
>     --
>     Digimer
>     Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
>     What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person
>     without access to education?
>
>     --
>     Linux-cluster mailing list
>     Linux-cluster at redhat.com <mailto:Linux-cluster at redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/__mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>     <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster>
>
>
>


-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list