[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [lvm-devel] Re: [linux-lvm] LVM 0.9 vgscan problem



On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:

> Rik, nobody was "sitting" on bugfixes. It just got fixed
> recently and still needed some testing before making it into
> 2.4.0.

Ahh I see...

> As I stated in my other email: Andrea Arcangeli's help to
> integrate 0.9 into 2.4.0 brought it in. TTBOMK there was no
> previous negotiation about 0.9 inclusion in 2.4.0 with us
> before :-(

OUCH ... so LVM 0.9 got pushed into the kernel before you
had a chance to do some serious testing ? ;(

regards,

Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to loose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com.br/



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]