[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] More Segfaults with LVM 1.0.1rc3



On Fri, 05.10.01, svetljo <galia st-peter stw uni-erlangen de> wrote:
> 
> Heinz J . Mauelshagen wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 09:25:56AM +0200, svetljo wrote:
> >
> >>is gcc-3.0.1 safe, or i should also use "-o0"
> >>
> >
> >Don't have a report for this :-(
> >Please try it.
> >
> it's seems to work
> 

I tried gcc-3.0.1 with LVM on linux-2.4.10 and had a lot of problems,
but it was no problem in LVM, it works with 2.95.4.

What i was seeing was funny stuff happening to the stack after
a function call causing (in my case) lvremove to segfault.
I have seen this with gcc-3.0.1 before, on another program.


Nils

-- 
 >   Nils Juergens  | nils muon de | icq 7090774   <
 >  If we all work hard, we can turn this company  <
 >      around 360 degrees -- gruntbert(LOTD)      <



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]