[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] More strangeness



On Oct 10, 2001  06:18 -0400, Jason A. Lixfeld wrote:
> No official patch for ext3 and 2.4.10?!  Can I run an older kernel
> version?  2.4.8 or 9 maybe?  Will that run ext3 and lvmtools 1.0.1rc4?
> 
> This is going back to a comment I made earlier about asking for a stable
> version of LVM/kernel to use.  Everyone said 1.0.1rc4/2.4.10 would be
> fine (but I didn't mention ext3, because I didn't think it was a
> factor).

Try 2.4.10-ac(latest) (optionally + ext3 patches).  That sounds relatively
stable from reports on l-k, and also has good performance.  It already
has ext3 and a relatively up-to-date LVM in the kernel (although there
are newer patches for both as well).

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]