[linux-lvm] LVM and SPL

[Jeff Layton]

"Gonyou, Austin" wrote:

> Yeah..there's no linking or anything. One is a hardware vendor, the other is
> a software vendor.

True. But when I look for something "like" a SAN for Linux, GFS
would be one product I would consider. In fact, we were considering
GFS and an EMC SAN for a project recently (until it got canned).

I guess I was thinking about this project when I made the comment.
Sorry about that.

Jeff Layton

Lockheed-Martin


>
>
> --
> Austin Gonyou
> Systems Architect, CCNA
> Coremetrics, Inc.
> Phone: 512-796-9023
> email: austin at coremetrics.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chemolli Francesco (USI) [mailto:ChemolliF at GruppoCredit.it]
> > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 3:43 AM
> > To: 'linux-lvm at sistina.com'
> > Subject: RE: [linux-lvm] LVM and SPL
> >
> >
> > > I agree that Sistina may be in a very akward position and I
> > > think it is
> > > a very good thing for them to change the license on GFS. They have
> > > to compete with the spector of EMC looming over them (I tried to
> > > convince Lockheed to give up on EMC and a different route without
> > > any luck. Their reason? "Because they're EMC!").
> >
> > Actually, EMC and GFS are different things AFAIK. EMC provides you
> > with virtual disks over FC, you still have to use them.
> > I don't see why you shouldn't be able to run GFS over an EMC-provided
> > virtual disk.
> >
> > --
> >       /kinkie
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm at sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html