[linux-lvm] pvmove

[Juan Pablo Giménez]

What's more secure, the Redhat patched pvmove or the original one?

BTW, I have a little patch to fix RedHat patched pvmove and make it work
with unpatched kernels...


        --- lib/pv_move.c	2003-07-11 19:10:26.000000000 -0300
        +++ lib/pv_move.c.rcom	2003-07-11 19:09:35.000000000 -0300
        @@ -916,7 +916,7 @@
         	ret = ioctl(group, PE_LOCKED_COPY, &pe_copy_req);
         	if (ret < 0)
         		ret = -errno;
        -	if (ret == -EINVAL)
        +	if (ret == -EINVAL || ret == -ENOTTY)
         		ret = -LVM_EPV_LOCKED_COPY_EINVAL;
         	
         	close(group);
        




Juan Pablo Giménez 

http://www.rcom.com.ar/
http://www.rcom.com.ar/comunidad/
Llave GnuPG:
MIT keyserver 
Web Rcom 

GnuPG fingerprint: ED97 6FB8 A9BE
26A6 789B 6657 0A15 EC2B D3D8 FD2B 

http://www.greenpeace.org.ar/secciones/cyberactivismo/nuclear.php3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/attachments/20030712/28523b01/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Esta parte del mensaje est? firmada	digitalmente
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/attachments/20030712/28523b01/attachment.sig>