[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[linux-lvm] Snit fight beetween LVM, MD and NFSD.



Good evening, hope the day is going well for everyone.

We just spent the last 24 hours dealing with a rather strange
situation on one of our big file servers.  I wanted to summarize what
happened to find out if there is an issue or whether this is a "don't
do that type of thing situation".

The server in question is a dual 1.2Ghz PIII with 1 gigabyte of RAM
running 2.4.26 and providing NFS services to around 100 Linux clients
(IA32/IA64).  Storage is implemented with a 8x160 Gbyte MD based RAID5
array using a 7508 3-ware controller.  LVM is used to carve the MD
device into 5 logical volumes supporting ext3 filesystems which serve
as the NFS export sources.  LVM is up to date with whatever patches
were relevant from the 1.0.8 distribution.

Clients are mounted with the following options:

	tcp,nfsvers=3,hard,intr,rsize=8192,wsize=8192

Last week one of the drives in the RAID5 stripe failed.  In order to
avoid a double fault situation we migrated all the physical extents
from the RAID5 based PV to a FC based PV on the SAN.  SAN access is
provided through a Qlogic 2300 with firmware 3.02.16 using the 6.06.10
driver from Qlogic.

Migration to the FC based physical volume was uneventful.  The faulty
drive was replaced this week and the extents were migrated back from
the FC based physical volume on an LV by LV basis.  All of this went
fine until the final 150 Gbyte LV was migrated.

Early into the migration the load on the box went high (10-12).  Both
the pvmove process and the NFSD processes were persistently stuck for
long periods of time in D state.  The pvmove process would stick in
get_active_stripe while the NFSD processes were stuck in
log_wait_commit.

I/O patterns were very similar for NFS and the pvmove process.  NFS
clients would hang for 20-30 seconds followed by a burst of I/O.  On
the FC controllers we would see a burst of I/O from the pvmove process
followed by a 20-30 seconds of no activity.  Interactive performance
on the fileserver was good.

We unmounted almost all of the NFS clients and reduced the situation
to a case where we had 5-7 clients doing modest I/O, mostly listing
directories and other common interactive functions.  Load remained
high with the NFSD processes oscillating in and out of D state with
the pvmove process.

We then unmounted all the clients that were accessing the filesystem
supported by the LV which was having its physical extents migrated.
Load patterns remained the same.  We then unmounted the physical
filesystem and the load still remained high.

As a final test we stopped NFS services.  This caused the pvmove
process to run almost continuously with only occasional D state waits.
We confirmed this by observing almost continuous traffic on the FC
controller.  When the pvmove completed NFS services were restarted,
all clients were remounted and the server is running with 80-90 client
connections with modest load.

So it would seem that the NFSD processes and the pvmove process were
involved in some type of resource contention problem.  I would write
this off to "LVM doesn't work well for NFS exported filesystems"
except for the fact that we had successfully transferred 250+
gigabytes of filesystems off the box and back onto the box without
event before this incident.

I would be interested in any thoughts that anyone may have.  We can
setup a testbed to try and re-create the problem if there are
additional diagnostics that would be helpful in figuring out what was
going on.

Best wishes for a productive end of the week.

As always,
Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D.   Enjellic Systems Development, LLC.
4206 N. 19th Ave.           Specializing in information infra-structure
Fargo, ND  58102            development.
PH: 701-281-1686
FAX: 701-281-3949           EMAIL: greg enjellic com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One is to make
it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies; the other is to
make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The
first method is far more difficult."
                                -- C. A. R. Hoare
                                   The Emperor's Old Clothes
                                   CACM February 1981

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]