[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] LVM limits? OT

David Robinson wrote:
Jordi Prats wrote:
I'm the system administrator of PADICAT (http://www.padi.cat). It
collects Catalan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catalonia) web sites to
provide permanent access to them (http://www.padi.cat/en/quees.php).
It's equivalent to Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org) but for a
particular culture.

Our software developers require us to have one large file system,
actually a single directory, with all this historically-classified web
sites on a gziped file.

I'm currently studying lustre and other HPC-related file systems to get
this large file system, but by now I have ext3 as our file system. Next
Monday I'm planning to extend it to 3TB o 4TB, so I'm currently
researching for restrictions because during next month I'll have between
3TB to 4TB more to add: so, it will become a 8TB file system.

Last time I fsck my 2'1TB file system I spend about 2 hours. Anyway, I'm
also curious about the maximums :P

The man page for vgcreate talks a little bit about limits:

"If the volume group metadata uses lvm1 format, extents can vary in size from 8KB to 16GB and there is a limit of 65534 extents in each logical volume. The default of 4 MB leads to a maximum logical volume size of around 256GB. If the volume group metadata uses lvm2 format those restrictions do not apply, but having a large number of extents will slow down the tools but have no impact on I/O performance to the logical volume."

In short, you're more likely to reach filesystem limits before LVM's. EXT3 has a theoretical limit of 32 TB, but 32 GB its not practical. Creating an EXT3 filesystem larger than 8 TB is umm, brave - as you have noticed the tools (eg. fsck) do not scale well w/ EXT3.

With a 4K block size the theoretical limit is 16TB.  The ext2/3
tools do not work beyond 4TB, or at least they didn't as of a year
or two ago.  I did report the problem to Theodore, not sure if the
fix was ever adopted, but you're absolutely right about the scalability
problems of ext3.  An fsck of a 16TB filesystem was something that
definitely required tea.

GFS or XFS (or others) may be more suitable, but it depends on your requirements.

Any of the extent based filesystems.  A fixed format filesystem like
ext3 does not scale.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]