On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:43:32PM +0930, Dan Shearer wrote: > http://code.google.com/p/zumastor/source/browse The "zumastor" name rings a few bells, so I do believe that's what I was thinking of, yes. > there doesn't seem to be disagreement between the people who maintain > ddsnap and the people who maintain lvm2, but I haven't found any > statements about what the way forward is. As a user, I'm just waiting to see what happens, and using the plain old LVM code in the meantime. That works out well enough, as long as I'm aware of its limitations, which is the only reason I mentioned the poor write performance with large numbers of snapshots. :-) So we'll see.
Description: PGP signature