[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [linux-lvm] 2GB limit





On 1/20/09, Bryn M. Reeves <bmr redhat com> wrote:
Larry Dickson wrote:
We have considerable experience getting parted to work. Basically, the
distinction between primary and extended partitions is not needed, nor are
partition types. There are other subtle differences too. Very annoyingly,

Correct.

SOME versions of parted interpret megabytes and even kilobytes (but not

Older versions, right?
 
1.6.19-1.EL had "standard" binary kB and mB.
 
1.8.1-17.el5 (CentOS 5.2), presumably a newer version, went to the decimal-only kB and mB. There were a lot of other format changes in output, too. We are on top of them, but decimal-only kB and mB is really a bad idea, since it's inconsistent with all previous practice and also with sectors.
 
Larry Dickson

sectors) as decimal only. For these you have to use unit B (bytes) to regain
control. Experiment a little, to see what uses counting from 1 or counting
from 0, and what uses last-index or total-size, as these off-by-1 errors can
be killer.

If you find problems like this with recent versions then please let us know via the parted mailing lists:

http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/lists.shtml

Ironing out the UI inconsistencies in parted is one of the areas that we are keen to improve at the moment so if you hit issues like this, we would very much like to hear about them.

Regards,
Bryn.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]