[linux-lvm] Either the superblock or the partition table is likely to be corrupted

Ray Morris support at bettercgi.com
Fri Sep 10 14:27:43 UTC 2010


>> Dumb/obvious question... you did reduce the size of the filesystem
>> *before* reducing the size of the LV, right?
>> 
> 
> And, if it was done out of sequence, is there a way to still fix it?

   If you did not increase the ize of the lv-wf2 FILESYSTEM yet,
you should be able to undo what was done.  See vgcfgrestore.
--
Ray Morris
support at bettercgi.com

Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/

Throttlebox - Intelligent Bandwidth Control
http://www.bettercgi.com/throttlebox/

Strongbox / Throttlebox affiliate program:
http://www.bettercgi.com/affiliates/user/register.php


On 09/10/2010 09:22:26 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>  On 09/07/2010 02:11 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
>> On 2010-09-07 12:45 PM, James Corteciano<james at linux-source.org>   
>> wrote:
>>> 2) I run system-config-lvm and reduce lv-wf1 from 160G to 70G and
>>> increased lv-wf2 from 10G to 30G.
>>> 
>>> Now, when I run the rhcs-nfs1 service using the command "clusvcadm
>>> -e rhcs-nfs1 -m rhcs-node1", I got failed result. I have checked the
>>> /var/log/messages and this is the output.
>> Dumb/obvious question... you did reduce the size of the filesystem
>> *before* reducing the size of the LV, right?
>> 
> 
> And, if it was done out of sequence, is there a way to still fix it?
> 
> TIA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
> 




More information about the linux-lvm mailing list