[Lohit-devel-list] Current Lohit Fonts Bugs

[Leon Ho]

Hi Rahul,

Good descriptions on the current problem thanks!

> 1. 179821[bn] and 169110[bn]: most important.
> 2. 189476[ta]: must affect normal use
> 3. 194615[hi][mr]: does affects normal usability
> 4. 197216[bn]: visible but not severe
> 5. 187871[pa]: small problem
> 6. 183144: its almost solved

I agree on the justification and prioritization. Please go ahead and generate 
patch separately from the top - then we will review together and get them 
into our project cvs.

If we have couple of patches before FC6 T2 freeze, we can incorporate them for 
wider testing!

Thanks!
Leon


On Friday 07 July 2006 22:17, Rahul Bhalerao wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> I have gone through these bug.  Let's see them one by one.
>
> Leon Ho wrote:
> >197216 [bn_IN]Incorrect glyph for conjunct
>
> Here the glyph for the particular conjunct is not well accepted and
> needs to be modified. Not need to change GPOS or GSUBs. The requiered
> glyph needs to be redrawn.
>
> >179821 addition of newly recognised unicode codepoint U09CE for ...
>
> Glyph for this newly added character is missing from its codepoint
> position. the glyph is present in the font, but on a wrong position(code
> point).
> The glyph needs to be shifted to its expected code point.
> Also, the keymap "Probhat" needs to be changed accordingly. The current
> mapping in the keymap is wrong, which is resulting the correct glyph,
> but the code i.e. data as completely wrong.
> This is quiet a major bug.
>
> >183144 [ttfonts-indic] Danda(U+0964) is missing in Major Indic ...
>
> This problem has been resolved now. Some languages don't have key mapped
> to the said character. But the problem is solved within the font now.
>
> >169110 Bengali Khanda Ta character for Unicode 4.10
>
> Same as 179821.
>
> >187871 [pa] font problems
>
> This is a simple GPOS problem. Not a major, but can be fixed quickly.
>
> >189476 [ta] -- Unicode 0BB6 not Appearing with Shapes
>
> Glyph is missing. the glyph needs to be drawn.
>
> >194615 Few combinations in Hindi font are missing
>
> The GSUB rules for the one combination is wrong. Can be solved quickly.
> This bug is quiet important.
>
> Overall I could prioritize these bugs as following:
>
> 1. 179821[bn] and 169110[bn]: most important.
> 2. 189476[ta]: must affect normal use
> 3. 194615[hi][mr]: does affects normal usability
> 4. 197216[bn]: visible but not severe
> 5. 187871[pa]: small problem
> 6. 183144: its almost solved
>
> >Rahul, Can you look into those problems and comment them so we can
> > prioritize the effort for the lohit project?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Leon
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Lohit-devel-list mailing list
> >Lohit-devel-list at redhat.com
> >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/lohit-devel-list
>
> Thanks,
> Rahul.