[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH 01/23] Return ECMD_FAILED for break

Dne 6.5.2010 03:10, Alasdair G Kergon napsal(a):
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>> Return ECMD_FAILED when sigint has been caught.
> Might seem reasonable, but this condition is also checked in many other places.
> If we're going to override the return code when a command might have been
> interrupted before it completed, shouldn't we do it consistently everywhere?

Yes there are more inconsitencies like this through the code - but in my
replicator case I've added 'extra' loop around this interrupt check - thus
I've added this fix at this place.

The problem with interrupt check may be possibly bigger - as the semantic is
not really clear - should we always return 'error' when Ctrl+C is hit by the
user? - maybe we should check for sigint before we actually want to iterate
next loop - thus if the 'break' was noticed after processing last loop - we
return 'OK' like no break was seen ?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]