[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [lvm-devel] [PATCH 29/29] Check for NULL pointer



On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:55:33AM +0100, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> clangs is happier and check for non NULL options value.
> Report internal error in this case.
 
That one looks completely pointless to me.
(And if you did have it, the right place for it would be after the switch that
always sets it.)

Nack.

Alasdair


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]