[lvm-devel] dev-prajnoha-report-select - report: select add _check_selection fn to support checking fields against given selections
Peter Rajnoha
prajnoha at fedoraproject.org
Fri Jun 6 12:03:43 UTC 2014
Gitweb: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=lvm2.git;a=commitdiff;h=5c3a72eb7ec90a8bc945ec04477208d8c1d2f528
Commit: 5c3a72eb7ec90a8bc945ec04477208d8c1d2f528
Parent: 710d2c246255c7e2d292f952d20d1bbaf5cc63b9
Author: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha at redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Thu May 29 09:38:22 2014 +0200
Committer: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha at redhat.com>
CommitterDate: Fri Jun 6 11:11:20 2014 +0200
report: select add _check_selection fn to support checking fields against given selections
This is rebased and edited versions of the original design and
patch proposed by Jun'ichi Nomura:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2007-April/msg00025.html
The _check_selection implements the actual field checking against the
selection tree.
---
libdm/libdm-report.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libdm/libdm-report.c b/libdm/libdm-report.c
index f85ccad..5c33ef5 100644
--- a/libdm/libdm-report.c
+++ b/libdm/libdm-report.c
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#include "dmlib.h"
#include <ctype.h>
+#include <math.h> /* fabs() */
+#include <float.h> /* DBL_EPSILON */
/*
* Internal flags
@@ -791,6 +793,158 @@ static void *_report_get_field_data(struct dm_report *rh,
return (void *)(ret + rh->fields[fp->field_num].offset);
}
+static inline int _cmp_field_int(const char *field_id, uint64_t a, uint64_t b, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ switch(flags & FLD_CMP_MASK) {
+ case FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return a == b;
+ case FLD_CMP_NOT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return a != b;
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_GT:
+ return a > b;
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_GT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return a >= b;
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_LT:
+ return a < b;
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_LT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return a <= b;
+ default:
+ log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_cmp_field_int: unsupported number "
+ "comparison type for field %s", field_id);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int _close_enough(double d1, double d2)
+{
+ return fabs(d1 - d2) < DBL_EPSILON;
+}
+
+static inline int _cmp_field_double(const char *field_id, double a, double b, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ switch(flags & FLD_CMP_MASK) {
+ case FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return _close_enough(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NOT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return !_close_enough(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_GT:
+ return (a > b) && !_close_enough(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_GT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return (a > b) || _close_enough(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_LT:
+ return (a < b) && !_close_enough(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NUMBER|FLD_CMP_LT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return a < b || _close_enough(a, b);
+ default:
+ log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_cmp_field_double: unsupported number "
+ "comparison type for selection field %s", field_id);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int _cmp_field_string(const char *field_id, const char *a, const char *b, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ switch (flags & FLD_CMP_MASK) {
+ case FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return !strcmp(a, b);
+ case FLD_CMP_NOT|FLD_CMP_EQUAL:
+ return strcmp(a, b);
+ default:
+ log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_cmp_field_string: unsupported string "
+ "comparison type for selection field %s", field_id);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int _cmp_field_regex(const char *s, struct dm_regex *r, uint32_t flags)
+{
+ return (dm_regex_match(r, s) >= 0) ^ (flags & FLD_CMP_NOT);
+}
+
+static int _compare_selection_field(struct dm_report *rh,
+ struct dm_report_field *f,
+ struct field_selection *fs)
+{
+ const char *field_id = rh->fields[f->props->field_num].id;
+ int r = 0;
+
+ if (!f->sort_value) {
+ log_error("_compare_selection_field: field without value :%d",
+ f->props->field_num);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (fs->flags & FLD_CMP_REGEX)
+ r = _cmp_field_regex((const char *) f->sort_value, fs->v.r, fs->flags);
+ else {
+ switch(f->props->flags & DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_MASK) {
+ case DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER:
+ r = _cmp_field_int(field_id, *(const uint64_t *) f->sort_value, fs->v.i, fs->flags);
+ break;
+ case DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_SIZE:
+ r = _cmp_field_double(field_id, *(const uint64_t *) f->sort_value, fs->v.d, fs->flags);
+ break;
+ case DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_STRING:
+ r = _cmp_field_string(field_id, (const char *) f->sort_value, fs->v.s, fs->flags);
+ break;
+ default:
+ log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_compare_selection_field: unknown field type for field %s", field_id);
+ }
+ }
+
+ log_verbose("%s field %s with value '%s'.", r ? "Selecting" : "Not selecting", field_id, f->report_string);
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static int _check_selection(struct dm_report *rh, struct selection_node *sn,
+ struct dm_list *fields)
+{
+ int r;
+ struct selection_node *iter_n;
+ struct dm_report_field *f;
+
+ switch (sn->type & SEL_MASK) {
+ case SEL_ITEM:
+ r = 1;
+ dm_list_iterate_items(f, fields) {
+ if (sn->selection.item->fp != f->props)
+ continue;
+ if (!_compare_selection_field(rh, f, sn->selection.item))
+ r = 0;
+ }
+ break;
+ case SEL_OR:
+ r = 0;
+ dm_list_iterate_items(iter_n, &sn->selection.set)
+ if ((r |= _check_selection(rh, iter_n, fields)))
+ break;
+ break;
+ case SEL_AND:
+ r = 1;
+ dm_list_iterate_items(iter_n, &sn->selection.set)
+ if (!(r &= _check_selection(rh, iter_n, fields)))
+ break;
+ break;
+ default:
+ log_error("Unsupported selection type");
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return (sn->type & SEL_MODIFIER_NOT) ? !r : r;
+}
+
+static int _check_report_selection(struct dm_report *rh, struct dm_list *fields)
+{
+ if (!rh->selection_root)
+ return 1;
+
+ return _check_selection(rh, rh->selection_root, fields);
+}
+
int dm_report_object(struct dm_report *rh, void *object)
{
struct field_properties *fp;
@@ -1339,7 +1493,8 @@ static struct selection_node *_parse_selection(struct dm_report *rh,
if (!(last = _tok_value_regex(ft, last, &vs, &ve, &flags)))
goto_bad;
} else {
- if (ft->flags == DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_SIZE)
+ if (ft->flags == DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_SIZE ||
+ ft->flags == DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER)
custom = &factor;
else
custom = NULL;
More information about the lvm-devel
mailing list