[Open-scap] [PATCH 01/11] Added implementation of getline for use on Solaris

[Marshall Miller]

I also agree that #3 seems like the best option.

Also, thanks for fixing the distcheck target :).


Marshall

> -----Original Message-----
> From: open-scap-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:open-scap-list-
> bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Peter Vrabec
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 10:00 AM
> To: open-scap-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Open-scap] [PATCH 01/11] Added implementation of getline
> for use on Solaris
> 
> 
> Please see:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/gnulib.html#VCS-Issues
> chapter "2.8 Issues with Version Control Systems"
> 
> which of those 3 option would you prefer?
> I like #3, but #2 is also OK.
> 
> 
> 
> On Friday, May 13, 2011 03:41:21 PM Peter Vrabec wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 09:40:10 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 03:31:20 PM Marshall Miller wrote:
> > > > +ssize_t mygetline(char **lineptr, size_t *n, FILE *stream) {
> > >
> > > I am wondering if we should look into using gnulib to make
> portability
> > > (and licensing) easier?
> >
> > I'm playing with gnulib. If I have a patch, I'll send it. :)
> >
> > > -Steve
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Open-scap-list mailing list
> > > Open-scap-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Open-scap-list mailing list
> > Open-scap-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Open-scap-list mailing list
> Open-scap-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/open-scap-list