[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Osdc-list] Fwd: OER-forum Digest, Vol 28, Issue 2



Interesting similar discussion on OER forun list, btw

Begin forwarded message:

Subject: OER-forum Digest, Vol 28, Issue 2
Date: November 1, 2012 5:03:40 PM EDT

Send OER-forum mailing list submissions to
oer-forum lists esn org za

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.esn.org.za/mailman/listinfo/oer-forum
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
oer-forum-request lists esn org za

You can reach the person managing the list at
oer-forum-owner lists esn org za

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of OER-forum digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re: [OERU] Keeping MOOCs Open (Kim Tucker)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:05:10 +0100
From: Kim Tucker <kctucker gmail com>
Subject: Re: [OER] [OERU] Keeping MOOCs Open
To: oer-university googlegroups com, contacts opencourseware eu,
OER-DISCUSS jiscmail ac uk, OER Forum <oer-forum lists esn org za>,
Tim Vollmer <tvol creativecommons org>
Message-ID:
<CAKF3+saLqT9+xi_HV7Fce15GFni6x8vabsNmv9p5S6vqjB6d7w mail gmail com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

It might be helpful for some to (re)visit this perspective:

http://wikieducator.org/Say_Libre

Some "open" initiatives and resources may also be described as "libre".
With respect to Creative Commons licensing, one needs to be specific.
Only Attribution-ShareAlike and Attribution are "libre licences".
(resources may also be liberated via CC0).

The article also explains that there is more to it than licensing the
resources.
They must be accessible with libre software and deployed in libre file
formats.

The vision is to liberate knowledge so that anyone may adapt and share it
beyond the capabilities of existing institutions which cannot meet the
growing global demands.

Kim

PS More:
http://freedomdefined.org/Libre
http://wikieducator.org/Libre_knowledge
http://wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Libre_Software
http://wikieducator.org/Libre_file_format


On 1 November 2012 18:42, Cable Green <cable green gmail com> wrote:

https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/34852

Cable

-----

MOOCs ? or *M*assive *O*pen *O*nline *C*ourses<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open_online_course> ?
have been getting a lot of attention lately. Just in the last year or so,
there?s been immense interest in the potential for large scale online
learning, with significant investments being made in companies (Coursera<http://www.coursera.org/>
, Udacity <http://www.udacity.com/>, Udemy <http://www.udemy.com/>),
similar non-profit initiatives (edX <https://www.edx.org/>) and learning
management systems (Canvas <https://www.canvas.net/>,Blackboard<https://www.coursesites.com/>).
The renewed interest in MOOCs was ignited after last year?s Introduction
to Artificial Intelligence <https://www.ai-class.com/> course offered via
Stanford University, when over 160,000 people signed up to take the free
online course. The idea of large-scale, free online education has been
around for quite some time. Some examples include David Wiley?s 2007Introduction
to Open Education<http://www.opencontent.org/wiki/index.php?title=Intro_Open_Ed_Syllabus>
; Connectivism and Connective Knowledge<http://connect.downes.ca/archive/08/09_15_thedaily.htm>,
led by George Siemens and Stephen Downes in 2008; Open Content Licensing
for Educators<http://wikieducator.org/Open_content_licensing_for_educators/Home>;
and many others.

A central component to these earlier iterations of the MOOC was the dual
meaning of ?open.? Justin Reich writes in EdWeek<http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/edtechresearcher/2012/05/all_moocs_explained_market_open_and_dewey.html>
,

The original MOOCs?were ?open? in two respects. First, they were open
enrollment to students outside the hosting university. That is open as in
?open registration.? Second, the materials of the course were licensed
using Creative Commons licenses so their materials could be remixed and
reused by others. That is open as in ?open license.?

These dual characteristics of ?open? are also core to Open Educational
Resources (OER). Hewlett?s updated OER definition<http://www.hewlett.org/programs/education-program/open-educational-resources>
begins: *?OER are teaching, learning, and research resources that reside
in the public domain or have been released under an intellectual property
license that permits their free use and re-purposing by others.?* That
is, for an educational resource to be ?open? it must be both gratis
(available at no-cost) and libre (everyone has the legal rights to
repurpose the resource) <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_libre>.
An OER cannot be freely available *or* openly licensed ? it must be both
freely available *and*openly licensed (or in the public domain) to be an
OER.

The new cohort of MOOCs are distinct from the original MOOCs in that they
are ?open,? thus far, in only one respect: they are open enrollment. The
new MOOCs have not yet openly licensed their courses. As MOOCs continue to
develop course content and experiment with various business models, we
think it?s crucial that they consider adopting open licenses as a default
on their digital education offerings. In general, the value proposition can
be enhanced for the new MOOCs and their users if the MOOCs openly license
their courses. A few ideas about why this is important:

  - One goal of MOOCs is to serve tens / hundreds of thousands more
  people with high-quality educational content. By adopting Creative Commons
  (CC) licenses, MOOCs:

  - can increase the reach of their materials by making the rights to
     use and adapt them crystal clear from the start;
     - will be able to serve even more learners because they?ll be
     granting legal permissions to use their course content in other educational
     settings; and
     - do not have to respond to individual permissions requests from
     users and can instead focus on delivering quality educational content to
     the largest number of students.

  - Commercially-focused MOOCs can adopt CC licenses to make their MOOCs
  truly ?open? (free of cost *and* free of most copyright restrictions)
  and still leverage the scale of these courses (with potentially tens of
  thousands of students) and the MOOC platform to charge for value-added
  services, such as the coordination of study groups, course certification,
  secure assessments, employee recruiting, and print-on-demand textbooks.

  [image: MOOC] <http://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/7549370822/>

  #jiscwebinar What Is A MOOC?<http://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/7549370822/>
   / Giulia Forsythe / CC BY-NC-SA<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/>
  - MOOCs can provide features their users want by incorporating open
  licensing options. Recently, the education technology company Blackboard
  has permittedusers to upload educational content under the Creative
  Commons Attribution license<https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/29633>.
  Since many MOOCs want to support individuals who want to share their
  creations as well as open collaboration between course participants, it may
  be worthwhile for the MOOCs to support users with this easy-to-implement
  feature.

  - By supporting open licensing, MOOCs will be positively contributing
  to the Open Educational Resources movement, reaffirmed in the 2012
  Paris OER Declaration <https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/33089>.
  MOOCs can be leaders and innovators for OER, increase their enrollment
  numbers, and receive the goodwill that comes along with being an active
  participant in this global open education movement.

  - Online education knows no language barriers, and a large percentage
  of MOOC participants are logging on from outside of North America (where
  most of the new initiatives are based). For example, in a recent MIT MOOC
  course with 155,000 registrations, students came from 160 countries<http://sirjohn.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/120925MOOCspaper2.pdf> (PDF).
  If MOOCs want to continue to attract and serve an international audience,
  they might focus on multilingual course delivery. It should be noted that
  MOOCs that release course content under Creative Commons licenses (at least
  the licenses that do not contain the ?NoDerivatives? condition)
  automatically grant permission for users to make translations of the
  materials. MIT Open CourseWare courses have been translated into at
  least 10 languages<http://www.core.org.cn/OcwWeb/Global/AboutOCW/Translations.htm>,
  including Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Thai, French, German, Vietnamese,
  and Ukrainian. Coursera and Udacity have already partnered with<http://gigaom.com/video/udacity-amara-partnership/> the
  crowdsourced captioning service Amara.

  - Openly licensed MOOC resources can give rise to interesting new
  courses and educational products and services. For instance, materials
  released under a license like CC BY<https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/> can
  be repurposed and reused on sites like Wikipedia and hundreds of Open
  CourseWare projects. Adopting CC licensing can support the conditions
  necessary for innovation that is difficult to predict (or plan for). In the
  long run, supporting the open ecosystem is beneficial both for commercial
  and non-profit MOOC initiatives. In addition, many educators and learners
  want to be able to use the resources outside of the MOOC environment, and
  open licensing grants this permission in advance. CC licensing opens up a
  much broader range of pedagogical approaches that enable all MOOC
  participants, instructors and students alike the ability to generate, use,
  and share content with each other.

  - Many MOOCs are concerned that their content will be ?stolen? by
  competitors. However, this fear is speculative. There are features of the
  CC licenses that can help assuage the fears of MOOCs. For example, all the
  CC licenses provide for attribution to the original author, preservation of
  any copyright notice, and the URL to the original work. When MOOC material
  are licensed under a CC license permitting the creation of adaptations, the
  adapted resources must be clearly marked to indicate that changes have been
  made, and a credit ? reasonable to the means and medium being used ? that
  the MOOC material has been used in the adaptation. Also, CC licenses do not
  grant permission to use anyone?s trademarks or official insignia, nor do
  the licenses affect other laws that may be used to protect one?s reputation
  or other rights ? those rights are all reserved and may be enforced
  separately by the MOOC. Finally, it should be noted that the original
  educational materials remain intact and preserved, exactly as released
  (most typically) on the MOOC website. So, there will be a record of the
  original publishing of the content. But beyond these features of the CC
  license, community and business norms make it very unlikely that competitor
  MOOCs will ?swoop in? and republish full courses simply because the open
  license technically makes this a possibility. Norms of academic practice
  typically carry more weight than any legal restriction made possible
  through use of an open license.


MOOCs should address copyright and licensing early on so they are clear to
users how they can utilize and reuse educational materials offered on the
site. MOOCs should choose to adopt an open license that meets their goals,
but at minimum it is recommended that they choose a public, standardized
license that grants to its users the ?4Rs? of open content<http://opencontent.org/definition/>:
the ability to Reuse, Revise, Remix, and Redistribute the resources. The
more permissions MOOCs can offer on their content, the better. Online peer
learning community P2PU has provided some useful documentation about how
to choose a license<http://info.p2pu.org/2010/05/25/how-to-choose-the-right-licence/>.
And CC maintains easy-to-understand information about how to properly
implement the CC license <http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Marking> on
websites and platforms. Of course, it is important for MOOCs and users of
MOOCs to understand some of the copyright and intellectual property
considerations that they should know about<http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Before_Licensing> before
they adopt an open license for educational content.

MOOCs have captured the public mindshare as an interesting way to deliver
high quality education to huge numbers of online learners. In order to
maximize the educational benefits that MOOCs promise to provide, they must
be ?open? in both enrollment *and* licensing. MOOCs should seriously
consider applying CC licenses to content they build, asking contributing
Universities to openly licnese their courses, and making CC licensing part
of their MOOC platforms. By doing so, they?ll be best positioned to serve
a diverse set of users and support the flourishing open education movement.
--


Cable Green, PhD
Director of Global Learning
Creative Commons
http://creativecommons.org/education
http://twitter.com/cgreen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "OER university" group.
To post to this group, send email to oer-university googlegroups com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
oer-university+unsubscribe googlegroups com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/oer-university?hl=en?hl=en
Visit the OER univeristy page on http://wikieducator.org/OER_university

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esn.org.za/pipermail/oer-forum/attachments/20121101/627261e8/attachment.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
OER-forum mailing list
OER-forum lists esn org za
http://lists.esn.org.za/mailman/listinfo/oer-forum


End of OER-forum Digest, Vol 28, Issue 2
****************************************


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]