[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Porting pam to Solaris, HP-UX, others



David Lee wrote:
> Hence my suggestion of "-f", which seems widely available, and doesn't
> adversely affect the use to which we are putting it (although it may be
> possible to dream up pathological cases if someone has gone in behind the
> back of "make" with malice aforethought).

But your patch says:

!       if [ ! -r include/security ]; then ln -sf . 

"-r or -f" Which is it?

Thanks

Andrew





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []