[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: To Mark Murray



Check http://www.dementia.org/~shadow/pam.html

Also check the autoconf macros in the development branch of PAM_KRB5 in
the Linux-PAM SourceForge repository.

cvs co -z3 -r devl anonymous@cvs.pam.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/pam pam_krb5

I wonder if anyone has tried replacing Solaris' libpam with Linux-PAM's
libpam recently. Not that there's anything wrong with Solaris' libpam.

Nico


On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:31:59PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mark Murray wrote:
> > How stable is the documented PAM structure? IE, how transportable is
> > PAM code from Linux-PAM to (say) Sun-PAM?
> 
> PAM's APIs are well-documented, and the incompatibilities between Linux-PAM
> and Solaris-PAM are also reasonably well understood at this point.  The vast
> majority of portability problems with existing Linux-PAM modules are related
> to other system APIs.
> 
> Steve Langasek
> postmodern programmer
--





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []