Pulse Reload configuration problem

[Michael Geraghty]

Sorry - I meant 'service pulse reload' - this seems to work and re reads
the lvs.cfg file as the messages file reads ... 

 

Nov 14 14:45:45 lvsrt1 lvs[1243]: rereading configuration file

Nov 14 14:45:45 lvsrt1 pulse: pulse -HUP succeeded

 

But, the new configuration / nanny procs do not get started

 

Only 'service pulse restart' works 

 

________________________________

From: piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Michael Geraghty
Sent: 14 November 2007 14:59
To: Piranha clustering/HA technology
Subject: RE: Pulse Reload configuration problem

 

I am just servicing web services - but just paranoid because these are
production servers and am afraid that the others won't come back online.
Also, the documentation says the 'service pulse restart' reloads the
configuration - so would prefer to use what it says on the tin

 

________________________________

From: piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com
[mailto:piranha-list-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of
rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu
Sent: 14 November 2007 14:56
To: piranha-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: Pulse Reload configuration problem

 

Just wondering, if you are only servicing web servers, why would
restarting it be an issue?  I have restarted pulse with other protocols,
and it is quick enough to resume the session, i.e. the keepalive on ssh,
telnet, and other IP connections.  Once in a while (usually from a
misconfiguration), you might lose client connection because of the
timing.


On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 14:32 +0000, Michael Geraghty wrote: 

Hi

 

I am running "ipvsadm-1.24-6" on Redhat 4/4 ES.  I have the system
configured using piranha and works very well apart from one thing .. 

 

The problem I am having is when I change the configuration when adding a
new site/VIP - I have to restart all nanny procs. The command 'service
pulse restart' will not work for me.  I get the following in my messages
file:

 

rereading configuration file

pulse: pulse -HUP succeeded

 

But the new nanny processes do not start up.  I also tried "kill -1 pid"
- but no joy.  The only thing that will work is a "service pulse
restart" - which is not good as there are several web servers live.

 

Any ideas or suggestions would be great

 

Thanks

 

Mick

 

 


************************************************************************
***********************
This email, its contents and any files attached are a confidential
communication and are
intended only for the named addressees indicated in the message. 

If you are not the named addressee or if you have received this email in
error, you may not, 
without the consent of Cognotec, copy, use or rely on any information or
attachments in any way. 
Please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your email
system. 

Unless separately agreed, Cognotec does not accept any responsibility
for the accuracy or
completeness of the contents of this email or its attachments. Please
note that any views,
opinion or advice contained in this communication are those of the
sending individual
and not those of Cognotec and Cognotec shall have no liability
whatsoever in relation to
this communication (or its content) unless separately agreed.
************************************************************************
***********************

	 
	_______________________________________________
	Piranha-list mailing list
	Piranha-list at redhat.com
	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list


************************************************************************
***********************
This email, its contents and any files attached are a confidential
communication and are
intended only for the named addressees indicated in the message. 

If you are not the named addressee or if you have received this email in
error, you may not, 
without the consent of Cognotec, copy, use or rely on any information or
attachments in any way. 
Please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your email
system. 

Unless separately agreed, Cognotec does not accept any responsibility
for the accuracy or
completeness of the contents of this email or its attachments. Please
note that any views,
opinion or advice contained in this communication are those of the
sending individual
and not those of Cognotec and Cognotec shall have no liability
whatsoever in relation to
this communication (or its content) unless separately agreed.
************************************************************************
***********************
	



***********************************************************************************************
This email, its contents and any files attached are a confidential communication and are
intended only for the named addressees indicated in the message. 

If you are not the named addressee or if you have received this email in error, you may not, 
without the consent of Cognotec, copy, use or rely on any information or attachments in any way. 
Please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your email system.  

Unless separately agreed, Cognotec does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or
completeness of the contents of this email or its attachments. Please note that any views,
opinion or advice contained in this communication are those of the sending individual
and not those of Cognotec and Cognotec shall have no liability whatsoever in relation to
this communication (or its content) unless separately agreed.
***********************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/piranha-list/attachments/20071114/31090f84/attachment.htm>