Pulse Interfaces

[Herta Van den Eynde]

On 18/03/2008, pb <peterbaitz at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Seth, FYI I am not with RH I am just nother Piranha
> user.
>
> You may want to check two more things
>
> (1) verify your lvs.cf file is setup correctly - if
> not you could see some of your interfaced not coming
> up, and that the IP's you are setting up are not
> duplicates.  Maybe someone at RH can review your
> lvs.cf.
>
> (2) make sure none of your PULSE / LVS / NANNY
> processes are going Zombie.  (ps ufax)
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Seth Paxton <seth at thefranchisebuilders.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the quick reply.  I have not
> > implemented a failover
> > solution for LVS, but that is going to change in the
> > near future.
> >
> > The issue also occurs when rebooting the LVS server
> > and Pulse comes up
> > for the first time.  It is not bringing up all
> > interfaces.  I have to
> > manually set the interfaces using ifconfig.
> > Something else I just found
> > that might be intresting is that when pulse starts
> > successfully, /var/log/messages shows all interfaces
> > are being brought
> > up in the ipvsadm routing table, but some of the
> > interfaces don't show
> > up in the ifconfig output.
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 12:00 -0400,
> > piranha-list-request at redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > > Send Piranha-list mailing list submissions to
> > >     piranha-list at redhat.com
> > >
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
> > Web, visit
> > >
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
> > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> > 'help' to
> > >     piranha-list-request at redhat.com
> > >
> > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > >     piranha-list-owner at redhat.com
> > >
> > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> > is more specific
> > > than "Re: Contents of Piranha-list digest..."
> > > Today's Topics:
> > >
> > >    1. Pulse Interfaces (Seth Paxton)
> > >    2. Re: Pulse Interfaces (peterbaitz at yahoo.com)
> > > email message attachment
> > > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > > From: Seth Paxton
> > <seth at thefranchisebuilders.com>
> > > > Reply-To: Piranha clustering/HA technology
> > <piranha-list at redhat.com>
> > > > To: piranha-list at redhat.com
> > > > Subject: Pulse Interfaces
> > > > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:41:57 -0700
> > > >
> > > > When restarting pulse, I have noticed that pulse
> > does not bring up all
> > > > virtual interfaces, causing some services to not
> > work properly.  In
> > > > order to fix the issue, I have to use the
> > ifconfig command to bring up
> > > > the virtual interfaces manually.  this is a
> > serious issue because high
> > > > availablity is our priority.  Has anybody else
> > had a similar issue?  If
> > > > so, what has been done to resolve it?  any help
> > would be greatly
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > ~Seth
> > > >
> > > >
> > > email message attachment
> > > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > > From: peterbaitz at yahoo.com
> > > > Reply-To: peterbaitz at yahoo.com, Piranha
> > clustering/HA technology
> > > > <piranha-list at redhat.com>
> > > > To: Piranha clustering/HA technology
> > <piranha-list at redhat.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: Pulse Interfaces
> > > > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:51:39 +0000
> > > >
> > > > Are you doing heartbeat and is there a failover
> > possibly holding onto some vips.  Have you also
> > tried service pulse stop/start.  Also service
> > network stop/start to see results
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Seth Paxton
> > <seth at thefranchisebuilders.com>
> > > >
> > > > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:41:57
> > > > To:piranha-list at redhat.com
> > > > Subject: Pulse Interfaces
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When restarting pulse, I have noticed that pulse
> > does not bring up all
> > > > virtual interfaces, causing some services to not
> > work properly.  In
> > > > order to fix the issue, I have to use the
> > ifconfig command to bring up
> > > > the virtual interfaces manually.  this is a
> > serious issue because high
> > > > availablity is our priority.  Has anybody else
> > had a similar issue?  If
> > > > so, what has been done to resolve it?  any help
> > would be greatly
> > > > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > ~Seth
> > > >
>

Also verify that lvs.cf is the same on both nodes.

Kind regards,

Herta

-- 
"Life on Earth may be expensive,
but it comes with a free ride around the Sun."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/piranha-list/attachments/20080319/2078db5e/attachment.htm>