LVS backup router not taking role
Ranjith Rajaram
rrajaram at redhat.com
Wed Jan 18 13:59:55 UTC 2012
On 01/18/2012 07:22 PM, Khapare Joshi wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> first time poster. I recently deployed lvs (primary and backup) with
> piranh and ran into few issues. I turned off the primary lvs to see
> backup lvs will take over. However it does not take over right a way
> seem require restart pulse. How does this fail over works if primary
> goes down ? should not this be happen right a way if primary lvs goes
> down ?
If primary goes, secondary has to take it over
It depends on deadtime
deadtime = n
Length of time before a node is declared dead and IP
takeover occurs.
lvs.cf needs to be checked together with system configuration. Look at
/var/log/messages
>
> And I have four real server- and it sees if one goes down whole system
> is unavailable (httpd service). Then I restart pulse and get the
> httpd service. I do not think this is right. could be please guide me
> in right direction to make reliable.
>
Do you have separate boxes for LVS directors and real server's ? [Are
you running pulse on any of the two real server's ?]
check the output of ipvsadm -L -n from the active lvs server [paste it here]
> PS: I use direct routing and have
>
> net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_ignore = 1
> net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_announce = 2
>
> in /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> sorry for too many question.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> Piranha-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/piranha-list/attachments/20120118/2a77570a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Piranha-list
mailing list