[Pki-users] (forwarded) Help needed on dogtag

[John Dorovski]

It was not a typo. I did use the port number 9545.


John

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Adewumi, Julius-p99373 <
Julius.Adewumi at gdc4s.com> wrote:

>
> Unless it's a typo on your part, the two port numbers are different...
> Could that be the problem?
> 8445  vs 9545
>
> From: Julius Adewumi
> @GDC4S.com
> Ph:480-441-6768
> Contract Corp:MTSI
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pki-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces at redhat.com]
> On Behalf Of Christina Fu
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 12:56 PM
> To: pki-users at redhat.com
> Cc: johndorovski at googlemail.com
> Subject: [Pki-users] (forwarded) Help needed on dogtag
>
> I might have messed up when managing pki-users and this did not come
> through.  Hence the forward.
> Christina
>
> Subject:
> Help needed on dogtag
> From:
> John Dorovski <johndorovski at googlemail.com>
> Date:
> Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:58:18 -0500
>
> To:
> pki-users at redhat.com
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I just installed a dogtag (1.2.0) instance on my Fedora 10 system.
> I used a SafeNet ProtectServer Gold HSM as keystore.
> The dogtag system installation and configuration were fine. No error was
> reported.
> All keys and certificates were generated inside the HSM.
>
> But when I tried to access the secure admin interface at
>     https://localhost:localdomain:9545
> I got error message:
>    Secure Connection Failed
>    An error occurred during a connection to localhost.localdomain:8445
>    SSL peer reports incorrect Message Authentication Code.
>    (Error code: ssl_error_bad_mac_alert)
>
> I checked the server certificate (viewed it with IE on a Windows box).
> It seems fine.
>
> Does any body know what is wrong and how can I fix it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-users mailing list
> Pki-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pki-users/attachments/20091117/a433c847/attachment.htm>