[Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error
Jack Magne
jmagne at redhat.com
Wed Mar 2 17:59:34 UTC 2011
Hi:
Having looked at this , I believe that this is the same issue as the
following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639082
The little code patch in the bug indicates that it is a matter of
identifying the extension to the system.
If this is in fact the same problem, this fix is available in the
current code and is slated for an upcoming release.
On 03/02/2011 05:56 AM, Elliott William C OSS sIT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We seem to have a similar or the same problem as was described in October 2010. I couldn't find any resolution to the problem in the archives.
>
>
> Description of our problem:
> In Dogtag, addition of CDP extension in enrollment profile corrupts request.
>
> Where it does work: RHEL5(x64)/CS 8.0/java 1.6.0_21-b06
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> In the profile the following entry adds the extension:
>
> policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl
> policyset.userCertSet.10.constraint.name=No Constraint
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaultImpl
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.name=CRL Distribution Points Extension Default
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerName_0=
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsIssuerType_0=
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http://publish.net/crl/foobar/MasterCRL.crl
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName
> policyset.userCertSet.10.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0=
>
> After "submit" is pushed during enrollment, the following appears in the debug log:
>
> [02/Mar/2011:13:34:33][http-9180-Processor19]: EnrollProfile certInfo : [
> Version: V3
> Subject: UID=test 99
> Signature Algorithm: SHA1withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.5
>
> Key: algorithm = RSA, unparsed keybits =
> ...
> blahh blahh
> ...
> Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false
> AuthInfoAccess [
> (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp]
> Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true
> KeyUsage [
> DigitalSignature
> Non_repudiation
> Key_Encipherment
> ]
> Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false
> SubjectAlternativeName [
> [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test99 at domain.net]]
> Extension[5] = CRLDistributionPoints
> ]
>
> The request is approved normally and the extension appears in the certificate:
>
> Identifier: CRL Distribution Points - 2.5.29.31
> Critical: no
> Number of Points: 1
> Point 0
> Distribution Point: [URIName: http://publish.net/crl/foobar/MasterCRL.crl]
>
> Where it doesn't work: RHEL5(x64)/Dogtag - pki-ca-1.3.6-1.el5/java(1.6.0_21-b06 and 1.6.0_24-b07)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Here, a failure appears already in the debug log after submitting the request:
>
> Extension[1] = ObjectId: 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1 Criticality=false
> AuthInfoAccess [
> (0) 1.3.6.1.5.5.7.48.1 URIName: http://test.net:9180/ca/ocsp]
> Extension[2] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.15 Criticality=true
> KeyUsage [
> DigitalSignature
> Non_repudiation
> Key_Encipherment
> ]
> Extension[3] = oid=2.5.29.37 val=48 22 6 8 43 6 1 5 5 7 3 2 6 10 43 6 1 4 1 -126 55 20 2 2 Extension[4] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.17 Criticality=false
> SubjectAlternativeName [
> [OtherName: (UTF8String)1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3,test100 at domain.net]]
> Extension[5] = ObjectId: 2.5.29.31 Criticality=false
> Extension unknown: DER encoded OCTET string =
> 04 44 30 42 30 40 A0 3E A0 3C 86 3A 68 74 74 70 3A 2F 2F 70
> 75 62 6C 69 73 68 2E 70 6B 69 2E 65 72 73 74 65 2D 67 72 6F
> 75 70 2E 6E 65 74 2F 63 72 6C 2F 70 69 6C 6F 74 2F 4D 61 73
> 74 65 72 43 52 4C 2E 63 72 6C
>
> ]
>
> NOTE: Extension[5]'s OID isn't recognized -- "Extension unknown"??
>
> Then during approval, the java error appears:
>
> The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error.
>
> Error Message:
> java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension
>
> Please contact your local administrator for assistance.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It doesn't depend on the java version - two versions result in the same error.
> addition of the (semi-documented?) parameter "crlDistPointsNum=1" does not fix the problem.
>
> Any ideas what the problem could be are greatly appreciated. We can't be the only ones with a CDP in the certificates.
> Could anyone show me a working profile?
>
> thanks in advance,
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elliott William C OSS sIT
> Sent: Montag, 28. Februar 2011 15:06
> To: pki-users at redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur]
>
> Hallo,
>
> I have exactly the same problem described in October in the Pki-users mailing list.
> In the list, there is no resolution. Was someone able to work around the problem?
>
> We are running Dogtag on RHEL5 64-bit.
> The beautiful thing is, the profile works in RH CS 8.0, but throws the java error with Dogtag.
>
> The java is slightly newer on the Dogtag system: 1.6.0_24 (where the error occurs) vs. 1.6.0_21 on the CS 8.0.
> Dogtag version is pki-common-1.3.8-1.el5.
>
> Any Ideas?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bill
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pki-users-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:pki-users-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of sean.veale at gdc4s.com
> Sent: Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010 15:21
> To: fdh at x-zone.org
> Cc: pki-users at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile: Type_0 : URIName error [bayes][heur]
>
> Hi
>
> I'm using RH Enterprise Linux 5.3
>
> Java -version gives
>
> Java Version "1.6.0.0"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.6) (rhel-1.11.b16.el5-x86_64)
> OpenJDK 64 Bit Server VM (build 14.0-b16, mixed mode)
>
> Looks like I'm running a slightly older version of the OpenJDK vm, and
> I'm on a 64 bit platform instead of the 32 bit one you are on.
>
> A red-hat rep would have to weigh in if either would be significant in
> this case.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
> On 10/22/2010 03:14 PM, sean.veale at gdc4s.com wrote:
>
>> Hi, Usually there is a reference to a Impl classID so the CA knows
>>
> what
>
>> to function/class to call when generating this part of the cert.
>>
>> For my system (built on Redhat CS 8.0 instead of dogtag but those
>> codebases are very similar) I have this in my cert profiles and it
>> generates the Crl dp entry in the cert without errors.
>>
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.constraint.class_id=noConstraintImpl
>> policyset.userCertSet.13constraint.name=No Constraint
>>
>>
> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul
>
>> tImpl
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points
>>
> Extension
>
>> Default
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true
>>
>>
> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http://
>
>> xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl
>>
>>
>> I don't believe you need to specify the No Constraint fields, as I
>>
> just
>
>> have them in there if later I wanted to enforce a specific CRL
>> distribution point, it would require less updates to the profile.
>>
>> This line here is the one I think you need.
>>
>>
> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.class_id=crlDistributionPointsExtDefaul
>
>> tImpl
>>
>> As it tells the CA what class to call into when generating this part
>>
> of
>
>> the cert.
>>
>> I don't think this is needed either, but it was in the example certs
>> from the CS 8.0 install so I left it.
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsNum=1
>>
>> I presume it is just letting the CA know after you added one CRL to
>>
> the
>
>> cert you can move on but I have dug into the code to find out.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
>> This message and/or attachments may include information subject to
>>
> GDC4S
>
>> O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be
>> accessed only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission
>> are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual
>> restrictions apply to third parties. Recipients should refer to the
>> policies or contract to determine proper handling. Unauthorized
>>
> review,
>
>> use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an
>> intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies
>>
> of
>
>> the original message.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pki-users-bounces at redhat.com
>>
> [mailto:pki-users-bounces at redhat.com]
>
>> On Behalf Of Frederic d'Huart
>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:56 AM
>> To: pki-users at redhat.com
>> Subject: [Pki-users] DogTAG PKI - crlDistributionPoints cert profile:
>> Type_0 : URIName error
>>
>> Hello Pki users,
>>
>>
>> Section B.1.4. of the RH admin guide refers to the following
>>
> acceptable
>
>> values
>> for crlDistributionPoint Type:
>>
>> DirectoryName
>> URIName
>> RelativeToIssuer
>>
>>
>>
>> Using PKIConsole, I have added to the caUserCert profile a policy for
>> include a CDP as follow:
>>
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.name=CRL Distribution Points
>>
> Extension
>
>> Default
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsCritical=false
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsEnable_0=true
>>
>>
> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointType_0=URIName
>
>>
> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsPointName_0=http://
>
>> xxx.xxx.xxx/crl/xxx.crl
>> policyset.userCertSet.13.default.params.crlDistPointsReasons_0=
>>
>> after profile re-activated, and new request generated, I get the
>> following error on the agent interface:
>>
>> The Certificate System has encountered an unrecoverable error.
>>
>> Error Message:
>> /java.lang.ClassCastException: netscape.security.x509.Extension cannot
>> be cast to netscape.security.x509.CRLDistributionPointsExtension/
>>
>> Please contact your local administrator for assistance.
>>
>>
>> Any Ideas what could be wrong ?
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pki-users mailing list
>> Pki-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-users mailing list
> Pki-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pki-users mailing list
> Pki-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-users
>
More information about the Pki-users
mailing list