[publican-list] [Bug 471988] New: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 18 01:41:17 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471988
Summary: [Feature request] beta and alpha productnumber values
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Version: 5.2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: publican
AssignedTo: jfearn at redhat.com
ReportedBy: ccurran at redhat.com
QAContact: ecs-dev-list at redhat.com
CC: publican-list at redhat.com
Classification: Red Hat
Description of problem:
Some products have ambiguous beta version names, some have downright crazy
release schedules and some have written codenames for prerelease versions. In
order to make maintainable beta versions which can be uploaded to the staging
server in a sane fashion (ie not emailing release engineering 3 times a week) I
propose that strings not entirely made up of numbers default to a productnumber
value of zero. Using productnumber=0 presently works displaying a value of 0 in
the title field. This feature request propose that the text in productnumber be
written to the title field and the number 0 is used for the RPM file and brew
values.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
.38
Additional info:
Should be an easy feature to add and Brian has agreed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the publican-list
mailing list